My blog is going to take a bit of a different direction. Often times I blogged for others, or for myself but not very often. I would whine or complain. This morning I am changing this tool to something more useful– a notebook. A journal of ideas, a lot of silly jots and rants. So every few nights I will take my random thoughts through out the day. Most of these are thought of, and then I elaborate on them later if I can recall them. The largest trouble I have is recalling thoughts like these, I have mild memory imparement.
Keep in mind that at first these rants and details running through my mind might not seem to be fluid, well written, grammatically correct or spelled well. That’s because they are fluid thoughts. My writing expertise will improve and I will master this skill.
Without any further adieu–
Earlier in the day — 09JUL07
Idealist, realists.. Opportunists… and how this applies to business.
Managers often times adopt an idealist attitude — “Lets have goal x,” understanding less critical details than that of an employee (or technician in my case.)
Employees quickly become realists doing the every day mundane tasks, constantly working with every detail and day to day road blocks and problems that arise. This is because they deal with minute details, not seeing the overall “grand” picture, perhaps a budget, a bad market, or the fact that the company may be facing very hard times if it does not migrate it’s business objective..
Neither are wrong (managers or employees), it’s just two seperate idealogies and perspectives. The most common problem is that this may allow for a lot of miscommunication.
A symptom of this miscommunication may be that subordinates feel disempowered. Espescially if they don’t feel part of a common goal. To bring up morale and increase communication managers need to allow ideas to feel welcome, even if they seem incongruent with the common goals, or their perceptions. At the same time, boundaries must be politely enforced, for example: “Every idea is a great idea… and I appreciate your passion regarding this subject but your suggestion has a better fit when working with ….x….” But employees must not feel disvalued or as if the idea had no worth.
–Separate thought about miscommunication across company divisions because of intelligence differences? although i’ve seen some idiots manage others. “large corporations” may see this more and more as their hiring practices may be extremely critical and degree based, like Google for example and having mathematical doctorates as vice presidents. I often don’t put a lot of weight on degrees (I think they are valuable, however, I see a lot of useless people having them. Useless meaning they have no value to me or my path or my journey… I absolutely believe everyone has value.)
Tue 10 Jul 2007 12:57:44 AM MDT ~ sitting outside thinking
I believe God’s existence is. When he came to know himself he had to divide himself, once to see himself, and a third time to see how two parts of him look. All three parts allowing themselves to autonomously see one another. I’ve been formulating in my mind how we as physical beings do this … but I have been hung up on the third one (the first two were easy, being…)….and a potential thought came to me…
The third dimension to triangulating our “being” (mind, body, spirit) or seeing ourselves besides reality (yourself, you, how you see yourself…seeing yourself in a mirror(which is seeing yourself through yourself)), and introspection (seeing yourself with your mind) is a third opinion– or outside data, how something else see’s you. so one way to put this maybe… “how you really are, how you see yourself, how something else see’s you.” although that doesn’t quite seem right, i think i will find better verbiage for this.
I often see third opinions being derived from within yourself through the use of chemical modifications… Something else seeing you, a drug for example. An alcoholic see’s himself through something else, another experience, a modification, a high. A drug user can see himself through someone else using a drug. This possibly isn’t reality, but seeing yourself through introspection and thought isn’t the reality someone else see’s, or the reality that REALLY is your being or existance.
I suppose most obonoxiously seeing yourself through something else is commonly through others (and this is perhaps even more parasitic). this is how society is so acidic and cruel– we see ourselves through others. “You’re fat, You’re ugly, you’re gay, you’re stupid… don’t be so stupid…” etc. when we could see our being through ourselves, or different means.
–Random thought: this thought or belief system that came to mind is espescially true if this “essence of being” or “i exist therefore i am” belief is adopted.