<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Brian Loves You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com</link>
	<description>my thoughts on tech, learning and the craft of life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:45:50 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Concerning Magic Valley Bank by mav</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>mav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/08/25/concerning-magic-valley-bank/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I happen to be shopping for a new bank at the moment, and I guess I can cross MVB off the list. That&#039;s really disappointing too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I happen to be shopping for a new bank at the moment, and I guess I can cross MVB off the list. That&#8217;s really disappointing too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concerning Magic Valley Bank by More on Magic Valley Bank &#124; Brian Loves You</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Magic Valley Bank &#124; Brian Loves You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/08/25/concerning-magic-valley-bank/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] you haven&#8217;t read my previous post, read it first. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you haven&#8217;t read my previous post, read it first. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Concerning Magic Valley Bank by Lisa @ Pleasant Valley Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa @ Pleasant Valley Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/08/25/concerning-magic-valley-bank/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Maybe the check wasn&#039;t big enough! (joke)

They seem to have forgotten the first rule of customer service       CUSTOMERS = REVENUE
And the second:
       Customers tell more people about negative experiences than they do positive experiences.

Some education about Fair Credit(a big fat document) is needed here:

1st)  Before they can access any of your reports they are to have written/signed authorizaion!
Doing so without your authorization is a violation of the act.

2nd)  If a company violates the Fair Credit Act (for example by accessing your information without your authorization- YOU COULD BE ENTITLED TO a minimum of $100 and a maximum of $1000 plus punitive damages and reasonable attorney&#039;s fees and costs for willful noncompliance with the Act.

3rd)  According to a June 2004 survey conducted regarding credit reports, 79% of reports from credit reporting companies (like ChexSystems) have errors or mistakes.

4th) ChexSystems only gathers and reports negative information, there is no uniform standard for that information
and no scoring like FICO. Chexsystems has been critisized for unfair reporting practices and there have been calls for reform.  The Greenlining Institute has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks were using when reporting negative items to a consumers ChexSystems report. ChexSystems has to give consumers 1 free report annually just like the other credit reporting agencies and they have to correct your report if errors/mistakes are found.

5th) Banks could use their own judgement, Greenlining Institure and Federal Reserve have been working on reform of Chexsystem and encouraging banks to be less dependent on it - What does that tell us, - Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in San Francisco, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems.
These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts.
Practices identified include: Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts
Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems
Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control etc

6th) Magic Valley Bank screwed up! Instead of sending you away frustrated they could have pointed out ways to correct
the problem, they could have called First Federal, they could have done an override so they could open an account and on and on with the could haves, and THEN THEY COULD HAVE HAD YOUR MONEY today and all the MILLIONS your business is going to make!
Instead OOPS, you went back to First Federal!

6th) WAY TO GO FIRST FEDERAL! I&#039;m sharing this with Greg Edson! He&#039;ll be glad to hear that his people are doing their part in the CUSTOMER SERVICE dpeartment, because after all, without customers where would any bank be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the check wasn&#8217;t big enough! (joke)</p>
<p>They seem to have forgotten the first rule of customer service       CUSTOMERS = REVENUE<br />
And the second:<br />
       Customers tell more people about negative experiences than they do positive experiences.</p>
<p>Some education about Fair Credit(a big fat document) is needed here:</p>
<p>1st)  Before they can access any of your reports they are to have written/signed authorizaion!<br />
Doing so without your authorization is a violation of the act.</p>
<p>2nd)  If a company violates the Fair Credit Act (for example by accessing your information without your authorization- YOU COULD BE ENTITLED TO a minimum of $100 and a maximum of $1000 plus punitive damages and reasonable attorney&#8217;s fees and costs for willful noncompliance with the Act.</p>
<p>3rd)  According to a June 2004 survey conducted regarding credit reports, 79% of reports from credit reporting companies (like ChexSystems) have errors or mistakes.</p>
<p>4th) ChexSystems only gathers and reports negative information, there is no uniform standard for that information<br />
and no scoring like FICO. Chexsystems has been critisized for unfair reporting practices and there have been calls for reform.  The Greenlining Institute has published a report indicating wide disparities in the criteria banks were using when reporting negative items to a consumers ChexSystems report. ChexSystems has to give consumers 1 free report annually just like the other credit reporting agencies and they have to correct your report if errors/mistakes are found.</p>
<p>5th) Banks could use their own judgement, Greenlining Institure and Federal Reserve have been working on reform of Chexsystem and encouraging banks to be less dependent on it &#8211; What does that tell us, &#8211; Beginning in August 2000, the Greenlining Institute, a public policy center headquartered in San Francisco, and the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco held four meetings to discuss possible reform in the treatment of individuals reported to ChexSystems.<br />
These meetings included a discussion of potential best practices which a financial institution could implement to reduce its dependence on ChexSystems data in its decision process on opening accounts.<br />
Practices identified include: Training staff to use judgment to assess risk when opening accounts<br />
Setting minimum limits to activate the use of ChexSystems<br />
Considering the possible override of a customer denial for situations that are beyond the customer’s control etc</p>
<p>6th) Magic Valley Bank screwed up! Instead of sending you away frustrated they could have pointed out ways to correct<br />
the problem, they could have called First Federal, they could have done an override so they could open an account and on and on with the could haves, and THEN THEY COULD HAVE HAD YOUR MONEY today and all the MILLIONS your business is going to make!<br />
Instead OOPS, you went back to First Federal!</p>
<p>6th) WAY TO GO FIRST FEDERAL! I&#8217;m sharing this with Greg Edson! He&#8217;ll be glad to hear that his people are doing their part in the CUSTOMER SERVICE dpeartment, because after all, without customers where would any bank be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCNA 640-802 by Damiean</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Damiean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/01/14/ccna-640-802/#comment-136</guid>
		<description>What resources are you using to study?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What resources are you using to study?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCNA 640-802 by deepak</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>deepak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 05:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/01/14/ccna-640-802/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>can anyone help me???i want a simulator for ccna that support SDM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can anyone help me???i want a simulator for ccna that support SDM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact Me by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?page_id=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/contact-me/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Are you jewish or have you ever heard of any other McManus&#039;s to be jews?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you jewish or have you ever heard of any other McManus&#8217;s to be jews?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux/Unix course at CSI by Ezra M.</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=57&#038;cpage=1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezra M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 02:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2006/12/07/linuxunix-course-at-csi/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I took the class a couple of years ago from Wayne..I can&#039;t remember his last name. Great guy, great teacher. I failed it twice though lol. It was my own fault, unfortunately.
I think if you want to increase the enrollement, get rid of RHES 3 and 4. There&#039;s several reasons why I think of this.
1) The kernel series is far outdated. Slackware Linux, the oldest surviving linux, as of 12.1 now uses the 2.6 kernel.
2) There&#039;s no usb support for RHES 3, maybe 4. I&#039;m not sure as I don&#039;t like RHES myself.
3) Most users will probaby come from a vista world, which KDE is better suited than gnome in most cases to help new users transist from vista to kde/linux.
4) Doesn&#039;t Red Hat cost money? Or do you guys get a deal for being a school/college? I know they release the source code.

I think that&#039;s about all I can say that I can remember. I know that this a really outdated response, but I saw at Hastings a signup sheet for the MVLUG!! I was so excited...I hope it gets going again. It&#039;s hard to learn gentoo via irc and forums lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I took the class a couple of years ago from Wayne..I can&#8217;t remember his last name. Great guy, great teacher. I failed it twice though lol. It was my own fault, unfortunately.<br />
I think if you want to increase the enrollement, get rid of RHES 3 and 4. There&#8217;s several reasons why I think of this.<br />
1) The kernel series is far outdated. Slackware Linux, the oldest surviving linux, as of 12.1 now uses the 2.6 kernel.<br />
2) There&#8217;s no usb support for RHES 3, maybe 4. I&#8217;m not sure as I don&#8217;t like RHES myself.<br />
3) Most users will probaby come from a vista world, which KDE is better suited than gnome in most cases to help new users transist from vista to kde/linux.<br />
4) Doesn&#8217;t Red Hat cost money? Or do you guys get a deal for being a school/college? I know they release the source code.</p>
<p>I think that&#8217;s about all I can say that I can remember. I know that this a really outdated response, but I saw at Hastings a signup sheet for the MVLUG!! I was so excited&#8230;I hope it gets going again. It&#8217;s hard to learn gentoo via irc and forums lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCNA 640-802 by Cypher</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Cypher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/01/14/ccna-640-802/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Your devices weren&#039;t supposed to ping.  There were no routes configured . That was in the instructions. Also why did you need to subnet, when you console into the main router it tells you where the addresses go. I do agree a lot of the questions are quite difficult. They are testing more theory and trouble shooting than straight facts like default AD. I like the simulations on the exam, to deserve the title CCNA I think the candidate should at least know how to set up a basic network. I would be upset if someone who had never even seen a router got hired and I didn&#039;t. I think you may have just frozen up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your devices weren&#8217;t supposed to ping.  There were no routes configured . That was in the instructions. Also why did you need to subnet, when you console into the main router it tells you where the addresses go. I do agree a lot of the questions are quite difficult. They are testing more theory and trouble shooting than straight facts like default AD. I like the simulations on the exam, to deserve the title CCNA I think the candidate should at least know how to set up a basic network. I would be upset if someone who had never even seen a router got hired and I didn&#8217;t. I think you may have just frozen up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CCNA 640-802 by Cisco Router guy</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Cisco Router guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/2008/01/14/ccna-640-802/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve noticed this type of thing a LOT with certifications.  There is a difference between booksmarts (ya just need to know the basic things.) and experience.  I&#039;d bet Cisco doesn&#039;t even mention tacacs for routers in their training material for the exam.  Ohh and there is quite a bit of test taking skill that helps too.

If it makes you feel better I took the CCNA three times before I passed, one I failed by half a percent point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed this type of thing a LOT with certifications.  There is a difference between booksmarts (ya just need to know the basic things.) and experience.  I&#8217;d bet Cisco doesn&#8217;t even mention tacacs for routers in their training material for the exam.  Ohh and there is quite a bit of test taking skill that helps too.</p>
<p>If it makes you feel better I took the CCNA three times before I passed, one I failed by half a percent point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contact Me by vera</title>
		<link>http://www.brianlovesyou.com/?page_id=42&#038;cpage=1#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>vera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brianlovesyou.com/blog/contact-me/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>Thank you for describing what happend to me recently, too !
I am also certified NE , never failed any test ior exam of any kind
and just went thru this horrific experience.
I opened an issue on Cisco website, requesting the
questions and answers, they refuse to provide it.
I asked if there are any guidelines about number of simlets and testlets, there must be a set limit,otherwise the failure is inevitable. Looks like cisco has no accountibility whatsover
for what&#039;s on the test, if they ask you how many ears elephant
has you have nowhere to complain..I felt too that some questions were obscure, and possibly with unclear answers.
In my case some test features did not function, just like you
described with the radio button..
I am now also &#039;uncertified&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for describing what happend to me recently, too !<br />
I am also certified NE , never failed any test ior exam of any kind<br />
and just went thru this horrific experience.<br />
I opened an issue on Cisco website, requesting the<br />
questions and answers, they refuse to provide it.<br />
I asked if there are any guidelines about number of simlets and testlets, there must be a set limit,otherwise the failure is inevitable. Looks like cisco has no accountibility whatsover<br />
for what&#8217;s on the test, if they ask you how many ears elephant<br />
has you have nowhere to complain..I felt too that some questions were obscure, and possibly with unclear answers.<br />
In my case some test features did not function, just like you<br />
described with the radio button..<br />
I am now also &#8216;uncertified&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
